Criminal animal abuse offences extention

Law & Regulation

In Effect

Spain

March 29, 2023

Summary

Organic Law 3/2023, of 28 March, modifying Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November (the Spanish Criminal Code) in the area of animal abuse, was published in the Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE No. 75) on 29 March 2023 and entered into force on 18 April 2023. It was sanctioned by King Felipe VI and countersigned by President of the Government Pedro Sánchez Pérez-Castejón; the Cortes Generales approved it under the state’s exclusive penal competence pursuant to Article 149.1.6 of the Spanish Constitution, making it applicable throughout Spain.

The law suppresses former Articles 337 and 337 bis of the Criminal Code — which had regulated animal abuse, sexual exploitation, and abandonment since progressive reforms in 2003, 2010, and 2015 — and creates a new Title XVI bis, “De los delitos contra los animales” (Crimes against animals), containing Articles 340 bis through 340 quinquies. The reform extends criminal protection from domestic and controlled animals to all vertebrate animals, with differentiated offence structures and penalty ranges for two categories: animals “doméstico, amansado, domesticado o que viva temporal o permanentemente bajo el control humano” (domestic, tamed, domesticated, or living under human control) and other vertebrate animals.

Key provisions: Article 340 bis criminalises, outside legally regulated activities, causing a domestic or controlled animal a lesion requiring veterinary treatment (including sexual acts), with 3–18 months’ imprisonment or 6–12 months’ fine and 1–3 years’ disqualification from animal-related professions and ownership; parallel but reduced penalty ranges apply where the victim is a vertebrate not in the domestic/controlled category. Article 340 bis(3) imposes higher penalties where conduct causes death (12–24 months’ imprisonment for domestic/controlled animals; 6–18 months’ imprisonment or 18–24 months’ fine for other vertebrates), plus 2–4 years’ disqualification. Article 340 bis(2) and (3) define ten aggravating circumstances — including use of dangerous means, ensañamiento, serious mutilation, commission by owner or carer, presence of minors or vulnerable persons, profit motive, use to coerce intimate partners, public events or online dissemination, and use of poison or explosives — requiring penalties to be imposed in their upper half when present. Article 340 bis(4) penalises serious maltreatment without veterinary-level lesions with a fine or community service plus 3 months to 1 year disqualification. Article 340 ter criminalises abandonment of any vertebrate animal under a person’s responsibility in conditions endangering its life or integrity. Article 340 quater establishes corporate criminal liability (fines of 1–3 years where the underlying offence carries more than 2 years’ imprisonment, otherwise 6 months to 2 years) and enables additional sanctions under Article 33.7 of the Criminal Code. Article 340 quinquies authorises courts to adopt precautionary measures including provisional changes in animal ownership and care, and mandates measures where disqualification affects the person holding title or care.

The law also amends Articles 334–336 on illegal hunting, fishing, marisqueo and use of destructive or non-selective means, and adds a new paragraph 4 to Article 334 on deprivation of weapons rights in hunting offences. The law was enacted the same day as Law 7/2023 on animal rights and welfare, which establishes a broader administrative protection framework; academic commentary describes Organic Law 3/2023 as creating the criminal dimension of this reformed animal protection regime. Its preamble explicitly cites Law 17/2021’s reclassification of animals as sentient beings in civil law as a legal driver for revising the penal response.


Background Context

Animal abuse was first introduced into the Spanish Criminal Code in 1995 as a minor offence and progressively converted and expanded through Organic Laws 15/2003, 5/2010, and 1/2015, culminating in Articles 337 and 337 bis. These provisions primarily protected domestic animals and animals associated with human cohabitation, leaving most wild vertebrates outside direct criminal protection. In 2021, Law 17/2021 modified the Civil Code to confer distinct legal status on animals as sentient beings, different from movable property; the preamble of Organic Law 3/2023 cites this civil reclassification as a driver for criminal reform. Academic and legal practice commentary identified interpretive difficulties and perceived gaps in the prior regime, including limitations in disqualification and permanent removal mechanisms. The Consejo General del Poder Judicial (CGPJ) is assigned a role in allocating courts for review of sentences under transitional provisions.


System Impact

Direction

Neutral / Administrative

Type

Alters Legal Basis

Significance

Moderate

The reform suppresses Articles 337 and 337 bis and creates Title XVI bis effective 18 April 2023. Criminal prosecution of animal abuse and abandonment since that date relies on Articles 340 bis and 340 ter, with courts applying the new vertebrate categories and penalty ranges. Transitional provisions require application of the more favourable law for offences committed before entry into force; CGPJ allocates review responsibilities to Juzgados de lo Penal and Secciones de Audiencias Provinciales for revision of firm sentences. Academic commentary notes the law’s interaction with Law 7/2023 (administrative animal protection framework enacted the same day) and prior Law 17/2021 (civil status reform). The law is listed as “vigente” (in force) in official and legal databases as of 2025–2026; no suspension or repeal is documented.

Anticipated Effects

If implemented as written, the extension of protection to all vertebrate animals would bring conduct involving wild vertebrate animals — not previously covered as “domestic” or “domesticated” — within direct criminal abuse and abandonment offences, subject to the distinction between domestic/controlled and other vertebrate categories.

If corporate liability provisions (Article 340 quater) and precautionary measures (Article 340 quinquies) are applied, companies and centres housing animals in commercial, entertainment, breeding, or other contexts could face fines and restrictions on operations, and courts could order provisional transfer of animals away from individuals or entities under investigation or convicted.

Whether the reform has produced measurable changes in prosecution rates, sentencing patterns, or the prevalence of abuse across sectors involving vertebrate animals in Spain is not established in available sources.

Significance Rationale

Assigned Neutral / Administrative (impact direction) because the reform restructures and extends criminal offence categories governing abuse and abandonment of vertebrate animals and modifies penalties, corporate liability, and enforcement mechanisms, but available sources document no measurable aggregate contraction or expansion in the number of animals in exploitation systems, production volumes, or geographic reach attributable specifically to this reform.

Assigned Alters Legal Basis (impact type) because the primary mechanism is the formal repeal of Articles 337 and 337 bis and creation of Title XVI bis with Articles 340 bis–340 quinquies, redefining the offence elements, protected subjects (all vertebrate animals in two differentiated categories), aggravating circumstances, penalty ranges, corporate liability rules, and precautionary ownership-change authority — fundamentally changing the legal basis for criminal liability related to vertebrate animal treatment in Spain.

Assigned Moderate significance because the reform applies nationwide across all autonomous communities, extends criminal coverage from domestic/controlled animals to all vertebrate animals, introduces corporate liability and mandatory precautionary measures, and establishes a dedicated criminal title for animal offences — but available sources do not establish system-wide scale contraction or elimination of any exploitation channel.

Impact direction is Neutral / Administrative; the trajectory sentence is not applicable.


Within The System

Affected Animals

Dogs
Cats
Cows
Pigs
Sheep
Chickens

Affected Practices

Industries

Meat
Dairy
Eggs
Breeding
Pet Sales

Key Actors

The Cortes Generales approved the law. King Felipe VI sanctioned it; President Pedro Sánchez Pérez-Castejón countersigned. The Consejo General del Poder Judicial (CGPJ) coordinates revision of sentences under transitional provisions. Juzgados de lo Penal and Secciones de Audiencias Provinciales review firm sentences. Legal practitioners and “operadores jurídicos” are cited in the preamble as having identified gaps in the prior regime. Academic analyses have been produced by authors including Carmen Requejo Conde and institutions including Universidad de Cantabria and Universidad de Chile.

Notice an inaccuracy or omission?

If you believe information on this page is incorrect, incomplete, or missing important context, you may submit a suggested correction for review.

Correction Form