Jallikattu Constitution Bench
Court Decision
In Effect
May 18, 2023
Summary
On 18 May 2023, a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India (Justices K.M. Joseph presiding, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose (author of the unanimous judgment), Hrishikesh Roy, and C.T. Ravikumar) delivered judgment in Animal Welfare Board of India & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., (2023) 9 SCC 322, upholding the constitutional validity of state amendments to the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (PCA Act) that permit jallikattu, kambala, and bullock-cart racing under specified conditions. The Court upheld: the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act 2017 and associated Tamil Nadu rules permitting jallikattu; corresponding Karnataka amendments permitting kambala (buffalo races); and Maharashtra amendments permitting bullock-cart races (bailgadi sharyat). The Court held that these state amendments do not violate the PCA Act 1960 or Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The Court recognised jallikattu and bullock-cart racing as cultural practices protected under Article 29(1) of the Constitution within the framework established by the state amendments. The Court held that the state amendments had removed the basis of the 2014 ruling in Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja (the two-judge bench prohibition on using bulls as performing animals), and dismissed petitions challenging the amendments and the 2016 Union notification. The Court directed competent authorities in the three states to ensure strict compliance with the amended acts, rules, and notifications governing these events. Petitioners included AWBI, PETA India, and other animal protection organisations; respondents included the States of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Maharashtra and the Union of India. The 2014 A. Nagaraja judgment has not been formally overruled but its operative prohibition on jallikattu and bullock-cart races is displaced within the three states by the upheld amendments.
Background Context
In Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja (7 May 2014), the Supreme Court banned jallikattu and bullock-cart races across India, striking down the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act 2009 and upholding the 2011 central notification listing bulls as animals that shall not be exhibited or trained as performing animals — documented in a separate Development record. In January 2016, the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change issued a notification creating a conditional exception for regulated jallikattu and bullock-cart races; this was challenged. Tamil Nadu enacted its PCA amendment act and rules in January 2017, providing a new statutory basis for jallikattu; Karnataka and Maharashtra enacted similar amendments for kambala and bullock-cart races. In February 2018, a bench referred the batch of challenges to a five-judge Constitution Bench to examine the cultural rights and PCA Act dimensions. Large-scale protests in Tamil Nadu and political pressure in the states following the 2014 ban contributed to the 2017 legislative responses. The Constitution Bench heard arguments over several years and reserved judgment before delivering the 18 May 2023 ruling. In June 2023, the Court clarified that the Indian Constitution does not recognise fundamental rights for animals as legal persons, distinguishing the framework from some interpretations of Nagaraja.
System Impact
Direction
Expands Exploitation
Type
Alters Legal Basis
Significance
Moderate
The five-judge Constitution Bench delivered the unanimous judgment on 18 May 2023. The Court dismissed petitions from AWBI, PETA India, and allied organisations challenging the 2016 Union notification and the 2017 state amendments. The Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Maharashtra amendments had already come into force before the judgment and had been implemented in the years following 2017 — jallikattu events in Tamil Nadu resumed under the 2017 amendment framework from 2018 onward. The 2023 judgment confirms that this implementation was legally valid. The Court directed state competent authorities (District Collectors, local authorities, veterinary officials designated under the rules) to ensure strict compliance with the regulatory conditions in the state amendments and rules. No subsequent Supreme Court decision reversing the 2023 ruling has been reported in sources consulted through early 2024. The 2014 A. Nagaraja judgment remains on record as a historical precedent but no longer operates as a controlling prohibition in the three states with upheld amendments.
Anticipated Effects
If the state amendments and regulatory frameworks are implemented and enforced as directed, jallikattu events in Tamil Nadu, kambala races in Karnataka, and bullock-cart races in Maharashtra would continue to be conducted annually under administrative oversight (event registration, competent authority permissions, on-site veterinary controls).
If the 2023 Constitution Bench’s interpretation of Article 29(1) and the PCA Act framework for state amendments is applied in future cases, other Indian states could in principle seek to authorise analogous animal-based cultural or sporting practices through tailored PCA amendments designed along the lines upheld by the Court.
Whether the 2023 ruling produces measurable increases in the number of animals used annually in these events compared to the 2014–2017 prohibition period is not established in available sources.
Significance Rationale
Assigned Expands Exploitation (impact direction) because the decision validates state amendments that re-establish the legality of using bulls (jallikattu, bullock-cart races) and buffaloes (kambala) as performing animals in Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Maharashtra, reinstating organised sport events involving these animals that had been legally prohibited under the 2014 A. Nagaraja ruling. The decision enables the resumption and continuation of events at a scale beyond what was permitted under the nationwide ban.
Assigned Alters Legal Basis (impact type) because the primary mechanism is the Court’s confirmation of the constitutional validity of state amendments that change what is legally permitted regarding the use of bulls and buffaloes in these events — displacing the 2014 Supreme Court prohibition through legislative and judicial re-authorisation.
Assigned Moderate significance because the decision affects three states’ specific bovine sport events (jallikattu in Tamil Nadu, kambala in Karnataka, bullock-cart races in Maharashtra), which are geographically and sectorally specific components of bovine-use systems. The decision does not modify broader cattle or buffalo exploitation in Indian agriculture, dairy, meat, or transport at the national scale.
The duration and persistence of the scale change is not established in available sources; no independently verified time-series data on event counts or participating animal numbers is provided in primary sources consulted.
Key Actors
The five-judge Constitution Bench (Justice K.M. Joseph presiding, Justice Aniruddha Bose as author) delivered the unanimous judgment. AWBI and PETA India were primary petitioners; the States of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Maharashtra and the Union of India were respondents. The Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Maharashtra legislative assemblies enacted the respective PCA amendment acts, with Presidential assent noted by the Court. State competent authorities (District Collectors and designated officials) are responsible for enforcing compliance. The 2016 MoEFCC notification providing the interim regulatory basis was also validated as part of the batch.
Notice an inaccuracy or omission?
If you believe information on this page is incorrect, incomplete, or missing important context, you may submit a suggested correction for review.